当代中国法学学科评价机制的问题与重建——以德国法学学科评价机制为参照系  

Problems of the Evaluation Mechanism of Legal Science in Contemporary China and Its Reconstruction——Taking the Evaluation Mechanism of German Law Discipline as the Reference Frame

作　　者：雷磊[1] Lei Lei

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《国家教育行政学院学报》2021年第12期39-47,共9页Journal of National Academy of Education Administration

摘　　要：长期以来,中国的法学学科评价机制建立在等级化和量化标准的基础之上。这种倾向及其特征贯穿于体制内学科评估与体制外学科排名之中,部分排名还具有浓厚的商业化和主观化色彩。通过比较可以发现,德国的评价机制强调法学的学术自治,重在内生动力;而中国的评价机制则强调学科应承担的公共责任,重在外在压力。中国不可能、也不应当完全照搬德国模式,未来的方向应当是构造主客两翼、多元均衡的法学学科评价体系,建构更多元的评价来源体系、更开放的评价对象体系、更合理的分类评价体系和更均衡的评价标准体系,从而实现学术自治与公共责任之间的平衡。For a long time,the evaluation mechanism of contemporary legal science in China has been based on criteria with characteristics of hierarchization and quantification.This tendency with its features goes through both the disciplinary assessment within the system and the discipline ranking outside the system,some rankings also have a strong commercial and subjective color.Through comparison,it can be found that the evaluation mechanism in Germany emphasizes on academic autonomy of legal science,focusing on endogenous power,while the evaluation mechanism in China stresses public responsibility that this discipline should take,focusing on external pressure.China cannot,and should not copy the German model,and the future direction should aim at such a legal science evaluation mechanism as emphasizing on both subjective and objective criteria with diversity and balance.Thus,we need to construct a more diversified source system,a more open object system,a more reasonable classification system and a more balanced standard system,in order to achieve the balance between academic autonomy and public responsibility。

关 键 词：法学学科评价机制 等级化与量化 学术自治 公共责任 多元均衡 

分 类 号：G642.3[文化科学—高等教育学]