检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐可 何桢[2] Xu Ke;He Zhen(School of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China;College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)
机构地区:[1]天津工业大学经济与管理学院,天津300387 [2]天津大学管理与经济学部,天津300051
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2022年第1期19-29,共11页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJC630192)。
摘 要:在知识经济与大数据智库联耦时代,我国正经历第四波“大众创业、万众创新”浪潮,深挖创新驱动的影响因素与过程效应,是培育打造高水平科研创新团队的重中之重。以我国高新技术企业科研团队为研究对象,基于知识螺旋与网络权力视角,针对我国16个省市高新技术制造领域的256家孵化企业开展实地考察和问卷调研,采用结构方程模型进行实证分析,检验网络镶嵌(关系镶嵌与结构镶嵌)—知识螺旋/网络权力—创新驱动的逻辑路径和影响机理。研究结果表明:网络镶嵌(关系镶嵌与结构镶嵌)显著正向影响创新驱动和知识螺旋;知识螺旋显著正向影响创新驱动,同时在网络镶嵌(关系镶嵌与结构镶嵌)对创新驱动的影响路径中发挥中介效应;网络权力正向调节知识螺旋的中介效应。Nowadays,we have entered the era of coupling the knowledge economy and big data think tanks,and the demand for innovation-driven is stronger and eager.In the process of innovation and practice of high-tech enterprises under the Chinese cultural background,due to a series of negative factors such as the intertwined network structure,the intricate network relationship,the need to improve the big data system,and the insufficient knowledge think tank platform,the innovation driving effect is not satisfactory.It is urgent to apply specific tools such as big data collaborative knowledge think tanks,network mosaics,knowledge spirals and network power to innovative practices.At the same time,corporate scientific research teams are also facing unprecedented tests and challenges.The key issue is how to use innovation-driven as an important engine,seamlessly connect the three technologies of network integration,knowledge spiral management,and big data think tank construction and exert their best effects to accelerate the construction of China's innovation system.There are three shortcomings in the existing research.First of all,the embedding methods of social networks include two types:structural mode and relational mode.Most scholars believe that these two types are separate and independent.Different network embedding modes have different impacts on innovative behavior.Therefore,mainstream research regards the two modes as different.It is an independent factor and if one of the mode is explored,the overall analysis effect is likely to be concealed.Secondly,in the intertwined network framework,the logical action path of the organizational network connection method on the innovation process is not pure and direct.It will inevitably be affected positively or negatively by other external factors,even though a small number of scholars have paid attention to knowledge management.The key value is in the social network,but the existing research results only focus on a single link or partial stage in the knowledge management,ignori
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33