检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张睿 ZHANG Rui(School of Law,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100102,China)
出 处:《莆田学院学报》2021年第6期33-39,共7页Journal of putian University
摘 要:被追诉人的阅卷权虽然具备正当性,但缺乏紧迫性和可操作性,在实践中难以被认可。被追诉人查阅讯问录音录像具有重大的意义。被追诉人查阅讯问录音录像具有现实合理性,查阅讯问录音录像不需要过多的法律职业技巧,讯问录音录像内容具有单一性,被追诉人查阅讯问录音录像可以提高诉讼效率,被追诉人查阅讯问录音录像的成本较低。Reasonable as it is in theory,the defendant's right to review files,which is difficult to be recognized in practice,lacks urgency and operability.Allowing the defendant to access audio-visual recording of police interrogations is of great practical significance.However,the defendant'still has difficulties in accessing audio-visual recording of police interrogations.Without too many legal professional skills required,the defendant's access to audio-visual recording can help to improve the litigation efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.30.154