检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨通进 YANG Tongjin(School of Marxism,Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,China)
出 处:《云梦学刊》2022年第1期26-39,共14页Journal of Yunmeng
摘 要:资本逻辑命题的核心理念是:生态危机的根源是资本逻辑。资本逻辑主要是指资本运行所遵循的效用原则、增值原则以及强制生产与强制消费原则。资本逻辑命题虽然是我国环境哲学研究领域一种颇为流行的话语体系,甚至成为了环境哲学领域的一个教条。但是,从环境哲学的角度看,该命题仍然存在知识谱系不够真实、关键概念界定不清、核心论点飘忽不定、当代世界的生态危机现象无法解释、理论逻辑难以自洽等五个有待克服的理论局限。资本逻辑命题以对资本的生态批判开始,以对权力和资本的双重遮蔽而告终。The core idea of the Thesis of the Logic of Capital(TLC)is that the root of ecological crisis is the logic of capital.The logic of capital mainly means the principles that capital follows,are the principles of utility,accretion,compulsory production and compulsory consumption.Although TLC has been a popular discourse,even a dogma in the field of environmental philosophy studying in China,it has five serious theoretical defects:1.Its genealogy of knowledge is not authentic;2.The definition of its key concept is not clear;3.Its key argument is indefinite;4.Its unable to explain the phenomenon of the contemporary ecological crisis;5.Its theory logic is incoherent.TLC begins with the ecological critique against capital and ends ironically with the double shields of capital and power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15