法律变革主义视野下的认罪认罚从宽制度  

A Study of the Leniency System on Admission of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment from the Perspective of Legal Revolutionism

作　　者：印波 YIN Bo(Beijing Normal University)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期74-83,共10页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“刑事司法业务考评对程序性法律后果的冲击与反制研究”(14CFX068)。

摘　　要：刑事诉讼法学领域研究认罪认罚从宽的主要范式之一是运用刑事诉讼模式对其进行静态对照,鉴于我国所处的独特的社会主义法系背景,刑事诉讼制度处于自上而下的不断改革中,应当运用动态视角对认罪认罚从宽制度加以观测分析。认罪认罚从宽制度并没有遵循自然主义进路,可以从制度线、适用线以及比较线角度分析该制度的法律变革主义特质。认罪认罚从宽制度的生成与实施具有改革性、规划性和效率性,改革红利是通过指令性、管理性、层压性的治理实现的。认罪认罚从宽疾速推进过程中难免产生一些阵痛,需要尽可能减少过度激进以及擅断造成的法解释力匮乏和制度矛盾,及时查漏补缺,不断健全完善该制度。In the field of criminal procedure law, the main paradigm of research on the leniency system on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment is to apply criminal procedure models to current system. In view of socialist law context of our jurisdiction whereas criminal procedure system is undergoing continued reform from top to bottom, it is necessary to observe and analyze the leniency system on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment from a dynamic perspective. This system has not followed the routine of naturalism. The attributes of legal revolutionism can be identified from the system, application, and comparison. The formation and administration of leniency system on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment is revolutionary, programmatic, and efficient. Reform bonus is achieved through directive, administrative, oppressive governance. The pains may be unavoidably produced during the promotion of leniency system on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment. It is necessary to reduce absence of interpretative capacity and conflict of systems as a result of excessive application and discretion, timely fill in the loopholes, and constantly improve the system.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 法律变革主义 刑事诉讼模式 刑事司法业务考评 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]