早期中国共产党人关于辛亥革命的阶级分析  

The Early Chinese Communists’Class Analysis of the Revolution of 1911

作　　者：刘辉[1] Liu Hui

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院中共党史系

出　　处：《中共党史研究》2021年第6期101-116,共16页CPC History Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“新民主主义革命时期中国共产党阶级分析问题研究”(20ADJ005)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在中国共产党人阶级分析的早期实践中,关于辛亥革命的研讨是最为重要的内容之一,它起源于陈独秀、瞿秋白等人对中国资产阶级特性的思考。国共合作和国民革命开始后,中共更自觉地以阶级观点来分析辛亥革命的性质与起因、参与者构成、结局与得失等问题,形成了具有创发性的思想成果,为新民主主义理论的最终形成作出了基础性贡献,也对日后辛亥革命的学术研究产生了深远影响。当然,这些分析也具有鲜明的政治斗争特性,出现了对辛亥革命性质认知的前后转变、对反帝内涵的过度强调以及对辛亥革命"失败论"的一度偏执等现象。尽管如此,它们仍具有政治思维革命性变革发端的标志性意义。In early CPC practice of class analysis, the content of discussions on the Revolution of 1911 was most important, as rooted in Chen Duxiu, Qu Qiubai, and others’ thinking on the characteristics of the Chinese bourgeoisie. After the beginning of cooperation between KMT and CPC and the beginning of the National Revolution, the CPC more consciously analyzed the nature and causes of the Revolution of 1911, the composition of the participants, the outcomes, and the gains and losses from the perspective of class, and it made innovative ideological achievements, which formed the basis for the new democratic theory. Ultimately, these discussions made a fundamental contribution to and had a profound impact on future academic research on the Revolution of 1911. Of course, these analyses also had distinct characteristics of political struggle, and there were phenomena such as changes in the perception of the nature of the Revolution of 1911, an overemphasis on the connotation of the anti-imperialists, and a paranoia about the "theory of failure " of the Revolution of 1911. Even so, they still had iconic significance in marking the beginning of revolutionary changes in political thinking.

关 键 词：中国共产党 阶级分析 辛亥革命 

分 类 号：D231[政治法律—政治学]