论晚清到五四时期的文学历程  

On the Literature Course from the Late Qing Dynasty to the Period of the May Fourth Movement

作　　者：林岗[1] LIN Gang(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学中文系,广州510275

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期87-94,共8页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：清末民初时期的文学像走进了无出路的死胡同,而“五四”新文学的出现更像无所凭借的“大爆炸”。从清末民初到“五四”的文学演变的历程,不是顺承,而是逆接。与其把前者看成新文学的序幕,不如把它视作悠久的古代文学的尾声。清末民初存在各自分流未能连通的思想观念、表达语言和文体文学变革这样三条线索。其时“士大夫之中的明白人”未能将这三条变革线索整合为一体,此事有待于“五四”新一代人完成。文学演变顺承不行,转而逆接,背后存在人的代际更替。The literature of the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China was more like walking into a dead end with no way out,and the emergence of the new literature in the May Fourth Movement period was more like a big explosion.The evolution of literature from the end of the Qing Dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China to the period of the May Fourth Movement was not a succession,but a reverse connection.Rather than seeing the former as the prelude to new literature,it is better to see it as the end of a long history of ancient literature.At the end of Qing Dynasty and the beginning of Republic of China,there were three clues,namely ideology,expressive language and stylistic and literary transformation,which were unconnected with each other.At that time,the"wise men among the scholastic officials"failed to integrate the three reform clues into one,which was to be completed by the new generation of the May Fourth Movement.The evolution of literature does not follow the succession,but is reversed,and behind it lies the intergenerational replacement of people.

关 键 词：清末民初 五四时期 文学演变 顺承 逆接 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]