检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐春红[1] 袁明莎 王天玉[1] QI Chunhong;YUAN Mingsha;WANG Tianyu(Yunnan Chinese Language and Culture College,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650092,China)
机构地区:[1]云南师范大学云南华文学院,云南昆明650092
出 处:《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)》2022年第1期52-60,共9页Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)
基 金:中国学位与研究生教育学会(汉语国际教育专业学位工作委员会)委托项目“云南省属高校汉语国际教育硕士典型案例研究”(HGJ201712)。
摘 要:以云南省三所高校汉语国际教育专业的硕士论文盲审结果的公平性和有效性为研究对象,分析了该专业论文盲审结果无效性的具体情况及原因,指出汉语国际教育专业具有跨学科性,不少论文盲评专家的专业不对口,加之论文评分标准过于宏观、专家的学术修养和评审态度差异大等原因都导致论文盲审结果的信度和效度不高。文章在定量和定性分析的基础上,提出了完善汉语国际教育专业论文盲审制度的具体建议。This paper analyzes the fairness and validity of the results of the blind peer review of the Master's thesis of MTCSOL(Teaching Chinese to Speakers of Other Languages)in three universities in Yunnan province and the specific cases and causes for the invalidity of such blind peer reviews.It concludes that the main causes for the invalidity are as follows:MTCSOL is cross-disciplinary,while quite a few experts at different academic levels and with different attitudes are not qualified in this field plus the macro-assessment standards.On the basis of both quantitative and qualitative analysis,this paper puts forward some concrete suggestions on perfecting the blind peer review system of MTCSOL.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249