检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋丽华 Jiang Lihua
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学民商法学院,陕西西安710000
出 处:《新疆社会科学》2022年第1期102-112,148,共12页Social Sciences in Xinjiang
基 金:司法部国家法治与法学理论研究部级科研项目“民事庭审录音录像制度研究”(18SFB5010);2020年中国博士后科学基金第68批面上资助“股东会决议瑕疵诉讼研究”(2020M683702XB);西安市社会科学规划基金重点项目“‘民法典’视域下个人信息侵权损害赔偿请求权构成要件重塑”(FS119)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:民事庭审录音录像证据资格的有无及证明对象的范围存在模糊之处,且获取渠道不畅通。上述困境主要由民事庭审录音录像功能定位狭窄、以庭审笔录为准的传统以及获取制度不健全导致。民事庭审录音录像具有独立的证据资格,法院通过数字化庭审系统制作的民事庭审录音录像是电子数据证据,光盘和交付当事人的复制文本视为与原件。民事庭审录音录像的证明对象包括程序性事项和实体性事项。当民事庭审录音录像和庭审笔录发生冲突时,应以民事庭审录音录像为准,但民事庭审录音录像并不能完全替代庭审笔录。向原审法院申请交付和向后诉法院申请调取是当事人获取民事庭审录音录像的两种有效途径。除审判公开的例外情形外,法院不得拒绝当事人的交付申请。只要满足了申请法院调取证据的形式要件,后诉法院应当基于申请调取民事庭审录音录像。There are ambiguities in the scope of the qualification of civil trial audio and video evidence and the scope of the object of proof,and the access channels are not smooth.The above dilemma is mainly caused by the narrow positioning of the function of civil trial audio and video recordings,the tradition that the trial transcript prevails,and the unsound access system.The audio and video recordings of civil trials have independent evidentiary status,and the audio and video recordings of civil trials produced by the court through the digital court system are electronic data evidence,and the CDs and the copies delivered to the parties are regarded as the same as the originals.The objects of the civil trial audio and video recordings in-clude procedural matters and substantive matters.When there is a conflict between the civil trial audio and video recording and the trial transcript,the civil trial audio and video recording shall prevail,but the civil trial audio and video recording does not completely replace the trial transcript.Application for delivery to the trial court and application for access to the court of second instance are two effective ways for parties to ob-tain the audio and video recordings of civil trials.Except for the exception of trial disclosure,the court may not refuse the parties'application for delivery.As long as the formal elements of the application for court ac-cess to evidence are met,the post-appeal court shall access the audio and video recordings of the civil trial based on the application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49