检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:廖丽 李颖晖 李黎明[1] LIAO Li;LI Ying-hui;LI Li-ming
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学人文社会科学学院 [2]西北政法大学哲学与社会发展学院
出 处:《社会学评论》2022年第1期238-256,共19页Sociological Review of China
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目“地位获得视域下农业转移人口的职业教育回报研究”(21CSH082).
摘 要:基于“相对教育”理论假说,本文利用2003年至2015年中国综合社会调查数据,考察了教育扩张对中国城市代际地位传递的影响机制。当教育被视为一种位置性商品时,教育扩张导致劳动力市场中教育相对价值下降。研究发现,随着教育相对价值的下降,家庭阶层背景对地位获得的作用逐渐增强,并且家庭阶层背景的作用大于家庭教育背景的作用。这一发现有利于解释既有研究关于教育扩张是否减少社会不平等的争论,其现实意义在于:当教育文凭无法帮助子女迈过预期的地位获得“门槛”时,父母将倾注更多资源弥补子女教育竞争优势的不足,以帮助子女获得预期社会地位。Based on the relative education theory,this paper used the Chinese General Social Survey data from 2003 to 2015 to examine the influence mechanism of educational expansion on the transmission of intergenerational social status in Chinese urban areas.When education is regarded as a positional good,the educational expansion will erode the value of education in the labor market.This study found that the influence of family background on status acquisition gradually increased along with the decline in the relative value of education in the labor market,and the influence of family background was greater than that of family educational background.This finding helps explain the current debate about whether educational expansion reduces social inequality.Its practical significance lies in that,when the education diploma cannot help the children cross the expected status“threshold”,the parents will afford more resources to make up for the deficiency of children's education competitive advantage,so as to help children obtain the expected social status.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.94