检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史子柯 马霄云 张雁山 金雪玲 寇海瑞 吴嘉明 SHI Zike;MA Xiaoyun;ZHANG Yanshan;JIN Xueling;KOU Hairui;WU Jiaming(Department of Radiation Physics, Gansu Wuwei Tumor Hospital Heavy Ion Center, Wuwei 733000, China)
机构地区:[1]甘肃省武威肿瘤医院重离子中心放射物理室,甘肃武威733000
出 处:《精准医学杂志》2021年第6期492-495,500,共5页Journal of Precision Medicine
基 金:甘肃省科技计划项目(重点研发计划)(19YF3FH-001)。
摘 要:目的比较直线加速器在6 MV X射线下对肝癌患者有均整过滤器(FF)模式下容积旋转调强放射治疗(FF-VMAT)和无均整过滤器(FFF)模式下VMAT(FFF-VMAT)计划的剂量学影响。方法选取2020年8月—2021年4月于甘肃省武威肿瘤医院确诊为肝癌并拟行放疗的患者10例,采用6 MV X射线分别设计FF-VMAT和FFF-VMAT计划,比较两种模式下治疗计划的靶区适形度(CI)和剂量均匀性(HI)、正常肝组织受量、危及器官(OAR)受量以及加速器总跳数和出束时间。结果FF-VMAT和FFF-VMAT计划靶区剂量分布都能满足临床处方剂量的要求。两种计划加速器出束时间比较差异有显著性(t=13.611,P<0.001),但靶区CI、HI、正常肝组织和OAR的受量以及加速器跳数比较差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论FF-VMAT和FFF-VMAT计划均能满足临床治疗需要,但FFF-VMAT计划实际出束时间更短,治疗效率更高,因此FFF-VMAT计划应用于肝癌的临床放疗更具优势。Objective To investigate the dosimetric influence of flattening filter volumetric modulated arc therapy(FF-VMAT)versus flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy(FFF-VMAT)on radiotherapy planning for patients with liver cancer using a linear accelerator with 6 MV X-ray.Methods A total of 10 patients who were diagnosed with liver cancer in Wuwei Tumor Hospital of Gansu Province from August 2020 to April 2021 and planned to undergo radiotherapy were enrolled,and 6 MV X-ray was used to design FF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT plans.The two treatment plans were compared in terms of conformity index(CI)and homogeneity index(HI)of target volume,dose distribution in normal liver tissue and organ at risk(OAR),and monitor units and beam-on time of the accelerator.Results The target dosimetric distribution of both FF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT plans can meet the clinical requirements for prescribed dose.There was a significant difference in the beam-on time of the accelerator between the two plans(t=13.611,P<0.001),while there were no significant differences between the two plans in CI and HI of target volume,dose distribution in normal liver tissue and OAR,and number of monitor units(P>0.05).Conclusion Both FF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT plans can meet the needs of clinical treatment,but FFF-VMAT plan has a shorter beam-on time and a higher treatment efficiency,and therefore,FFF-VMAT plan has more advantages when applied in clinical radiotherapy for liver cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145