对比盐酸米诺环素软膏和碘仿纱条填塞拔牙窝治疗干槽症的效果  

The effect of minocycline hydrochloride ointment and iodoform gauze in the treatment of dry socket

作　　者：冯凯 FENG Kai(Dalian Stomatological Hospital,Dalian 116021,China)

机构地区：[1]大连市口腔医院,116021

出　　处：《中国现代药物应用》2022年第1期161-163,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application

摘　　要：目的对比干槽症患者采用盐酸米诺环素软膏与碘仿纱条填塞拔牙窝的临床疗效。方法 90例干槽症患者,随机分为A组及B组,每组45例。A组采用碘仿纱条填塞拔牙窝, B组采用盐酸米诺环素软膏填塞拔牙窝。对比两组患者的治疗效果,治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分。结果治疗后,两组的总有效率对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但B组的显效率73.33%高于A组的53.33%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后, B组的VAS评分(1.19±0.24)分低于A组的(1.34±0.15)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论干槽症患者采用盐酸米诺环素软膏与碘仿纱条填塞拔牙窝均可以取得良好的疗效,但盐酸米诺环素软膏的治疗显效率更高,疼痛更轻,且操作更加简单,患者的依从性更高,临床推广价值更高。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment and iodoform gauze in the treatment of dry socket. Methods A total of 90 patients with dry socket were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 45 cases in each group. Group A used iodoform gauze to fill the extraction sockets, and group B used minocycline hydrochloride ointment to fill the extraction sockets. The therapeutic effects, and visual analogue scale(VAS) scores before and after treatment of the two groups were compared.Results After treatment, the total effective rate of the two groups was compared, and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). However, the effective rate 73.33% of group B was higher than 53.33% of group A, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). After treatment, the VAS score(1.19±0.24) points of group B was lower than(1.34±0.15) points of group A, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Minocycline hydrochloride ointment and iodoform gauze can achieve good efficacy on patients with dry socket, but minocycline hydrochloride ointment is more efficient, less painful, and simpler to operate, and the patient’s compliance is higher, so the clinical promotion value is higher.

关 键 词：干槽症 盐酸米诺环素软膏 碘仿纱条 填塞拔牙窝 

分 类 号：R782.11[医药卫生—口腔医学]