检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张翔宇 张帅 赖浩[1] 冯雁(综述)[1] 林源(审校)[1] Xiangyu Zhang;Shuai Zhang;Hao Lai;Yan Feng;Yuan Lin(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital,Nanning 530021,China)
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院胃肠外科,南宁市530021
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床》2021年第24期1287-1290,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
基 金:广西重点研发项目(编号:AB16380202,AB18221086)资助。
摘 要:近年来,在医药卫生领域,利用真实世界数据生成真实世界证据的研究方法在药品研发、审批、适应证拓展等领域取得广泛的关注和认可,开展真实可信、高质量的真实世界研究证据(real world evidence,RWE),已成为循证医学的一个重要发展方向。本文介绍了近年来国内外关于结直肠癌真实世界研究的现状,将真实世界研究(real world research/study,RWS)与相应的随机对照研究(randomized controlled trial,RCT)的meta分析结果进行对比和评价,以阐述RWS的特征、研究方法、相对于传统RCT研究的优势,并归纳其在肠癌领域的应用现状。在此基础上,对RWS在结直肠癌临床研究中的价值和前景进行总结,为后续研究提供新的思路。In recent years,in the medical and health field,the research method of generating real world evidence(RWE)using real-world data has gained increasing attention and recognition in the areas of drug research and development,approval,and expansion of indications.In addition,it has become an important development direction of evidence-based medicine to discover authentic and high-quality RWE.In this review,recent articles on real world research/study(RWS)of colorectal cancer at home and abroad were introduced.Moreover,the results of the meta-analysis of RWS and its corresponding randomized controlled trials(RCT)were compared and evaluated to elaborate on the characteristics,research methods,and advantages of RWS compared with traditional studies,and the condition of RWS application in the field of colorectal cancer was summarized.On this basis,the value and prospects of RWS in clinical research on colorectal cancer were summarized,providing new ideas for researchers in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249