检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金琳雅[1] 王彧[1] 尹梅[1] JIN Linya;WANG Yu;YIN Mei(College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学人文社会科学学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150081
出 处:《中国医学伦理学》2022年第1期66-70,共5页Chinese Medical Ethics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学项目“基于设计结构化理论医师行为原生力水平评价及影响因素研究”(18YJCZH185);四川医事卫生法治研究中心科研项目“突发公共卫生事件中医务人员的健康保障研究”(YF20-Q15)。
摘 要:新冠肺炎疫情暴发,多省市先后宣布启动突发公共卫生事件一级响应。医务人员作为抗击疫情的中坚力量,面临着医疗防护物资缺乏、病毒感染高风险性等诸多伦理困境,健康生命权益受到了冲击。从论述突发公共卫生事件与生命健康权的概念入手,以突发公共卫生事件的实践指南为基础,探讨医务人员生命健康权保障的理论与现实依据。以新冠肺炎疫情为例,提出突发公共卫生事件中医务人员生命健康权的保障举措,以期更好地应对新冠肺炎疫情,保障医务人员的生命健康权益。With the COVID-19 outbreak,many provinces and municipalities have announced the first-level response to public health emergencies.As the backbone of fighting the epidemic,medical staff are faced with many ethical dilemmas,such as the lack of medical protection materials,the high risk of virus infection,discrimination and so on,and their health and life rights and interests have been impacted.Starting with the concept of public health emergencies and the right to life and health,the theory and display basis of the right of life and health were discussed based on the practical guidelines of public health emergencies.Taking the COVID-19 epidemic as an example,this paper proposed measures for ensuring the right to life and health of medical staff in public health emergencies,so as to better cope with the epidemic of COVID-19 and protect the life and health of medical workers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222