高校教师“预告辞职权”的司法适用疑难和立法完善——兼评《事业单位人事管理条例》第17条  

Difficulties in Judicial Application and Perfection of Legislation of“Premonitory Demission Right”of College Teacher——Comment on Article 17 of the“Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions”

作　　者：张夫美 徐宜可[1] Zhang Fumei;Xu Yike(Henan Polytechnic University,Jiaozuo Henan 454000)

机构地区：[1]河南理工大学,河南焦作454000

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2021年第5期7-11,46,共6页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：《事业单位人事管理条例》第17条赋予高校教师享有"预告辞职权",但又允许双方通过"约定"的形式对预告辞职权进行限制。预告辞职权制度作为授权性法律规定,不应通过约定的形式被限制或撤销。但基于"公益优先"原则,特定条件下,个人权利应让位于社会公益。结合条例实施以来的司法适用现状和高校人才流动的实际,分析认为30天的预告期设置过于单一,立法应对"约定"的合理限度设置底线式保护,将"约定"的范围界定在公益保护的"必要性"上。The article 17 of the“Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions”grants college teachers the right to premonitory demission,but also allows both parties to restrict the right through agreement.However,the right to premonitory demission,as an authorizing legal provision,should not be restricted or revoked in an agreed form.Based on the principle of“public welfare priority”,individual rights should give way to social welfare.Combining the status of judicial application since the implementation of the regulations and the reality of the flow of talents in colleges and universities,this article analyzed that the 30-day notice period is too simple,and the legislation should set a bottom-line protection to the reasonable limit of the“agreement”,and define the scope of the“agreement”in the“necessity”of public welfare protection.

关 键 词：预告辞职权 预告期 公益优先 权益平衡 

分 类 号：D922.52[政治法律—民商法学]