检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜涛[1] 陆昊业 Jiang Tao;Lu Haoye
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学法学院
出 处:《电子知识产权》2022年第1期77-86,共10页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:以电子信息技术侵犯著作权的犯罪往往由多个无意思联络的行为人共同实施,单一化的传统入罪标准难以有效规制。基于该类犯罪高度分工化的特征,犯罪主体可以被划分为网络服务提供者和侵权资源提供者两大类型。网络服务提供者怠于履行其内容审查义务、情节严重的行为应当被认定为犯罪,内容审查义务的边界是确定其入罪标准的核心,但同时需要注意入罪标准、内容审查义务与信息传播权间的界限。大部分侵权资源提供者的行为仍然适用传统的入罪标准,但其中非法经营额所涵盖的范围需要适当扩张。Copyright infringement via electronic information technology is generally committed by multiple unintentional actors.Therefore,it is diffi cult to effectively regulate it based on the single traditional standard of criminalization.Based on the characteristics of the high division of labor of such crime,the subject of crime can be divided into two types,namely,network service provider and resource provider.The behavior of network service providers who are lazy to fulfill their content review obligations with serious circumstances should be recognized as a crime.The boundary of content review obligations is the core of determining their incrimination standards.However,it is necessary to pay attention to the boundary between incrimination standards,content review obligations,and the right to information dissemination.The traditional criminalization criteria are still applicable to the behavior of most resource providers,but the scope of illegal business requires appropriately expanded.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49