检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张丽华 段彩彬 ZHANG Lihua;DUAN Caibin(School of Psychology,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,Liaoning Province,China;Students'Affairs Division,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁大连116029 [2]沈阳农业大学学生处,沈阳110866
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2022年第3期248-254,共7页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L19BSH004)。
摘 要:目的:考察不同类型高自尊个体在不同情绪启动下注意偏向和注意控制的特点。方法:对大学生956人,根据自尊量表(SES)、内隐联想测验(IAT)得分筛选出脆弱型高自尊组和安全型高自尊组各57人。两组完成不同情绪启动下空间线索实验,当线索无效时,根据被试对攻击性词语的反应时与中性词语的反应时差值(RTI)的变异程度,获得情绪启动下的注意偏向特点;两组完成不同情绪启动下Flanker实验,根据不同情绪启动下被试干扰效应值的差异,获得情绪启动下的注意控制特点。结果:脆弱型高自尊组在高、低回避动机情绪下RTI值均高于中性动机情绪,在高趋近动机情绪下RTI值低于中性动机情绪;安全型高自尊组在高、低趋近动机情绪下RTI值均低于中性动机情绪,在高回避动机情绪下RTI值高于中性动机情绪(均P<0.05)。不同高自尊组在高趋近、高回避动机情绪下干扰效应得分高于中性动机情绪,在低趋近动机情绪下干扰效应得分低于中性动机情绪(均P<0.05)。结论:不同情绪启动对不同类型高自尊个体注意偏向和注意控制起调节或促进作用。Objective:To investigate the characteristics of attention bias and attention control of different types of high self-esteem individuals under different emotional priming.Methods:A total of 956 college students were selected,and 57 students were selected as fragile high self-esteem group and secure high self-esteem group,respectively,according to the scores of the Self-Esteem Scale(SES)and Implicit Association Test(IAT).The two groups completed the spatial cueing experiment under different emotional priming.When the cues were invalid,the attention bias characteristics under emotional priming were obtained according to the variation of reaction time difference(RTI)between aggressive words and neutral words.The two groups completed the Flanker experiment under different emotional priming.According to the difference of interference effect value under different emotional priming,the characteristics of attention control under emotional priming were obtained.Results:The RTI of fragile high self-esteem group was higher in high and low avoidance motivation of emotion than in neutral motivation of emotion,and lower in high approaching motivation of emotion than in neutral motivation of emotion.The RTI of se-cure high self-esteem group was lower in high and low approaching motivation of emotion than in neutral motiva-tion of emotion,and higher in high avoidance motivation of emotion than in neutral motivation of emotion(Ps<0.05).The scores of interference effect of different high self-esteem groups were higher in high approaching and high avoidance motivation of emotion than in neutral motivation of emotion,and lower in low approaching motivation of emotion than in neutral motivation of emotion(Ps<0.05).Conclusion:Different emotional priming could regulate or promote attention bias and attention control in different types of high self-esteem individuals.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] B842.6[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30