代持股权执行异议之诉的审判困境与破解  

Trial dilemma and solution of suit of dissent of share-holding entrustment

作　　者：黄宣[1] 朱永进 HUANG Xuan;ZHU Yong-jin(Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期89-96,共8页Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题(CLS(2020)ZX040)。

摘　　要：我国现行法律及相关司法解释对有限责任公司代持股权的执行尚缺乏明确规定,司法实践中法院对此类案件的处理也存在争议。对《公司法》第32条第3款所称的“第三人”可通过立法解释或司法解释明确其含义,提供统一适用标准。当显名股东为被执行人时,隐名股东不得对抗执行代持股权;当隐名股东为被执行人时,显名股东能否对抗执行,人民法院应当分情形处理。The current laws and the related judicial interpretations of China do not have clear regulations on the executing of share-holding entrustment of limited liability companies,and the court also has disputes on the handling of such cases in judicial practice.The connotation of“third party”referred to in Article 32,Paragraph 3 of the Company Law can be clarified through legislative interpretation or judicial interpretation to provide uniform applicable standards.When the nominal shareholder is the executed person,the anonymous shareholder shall not resist the execution of share-holding entrustment.While the anonymous shareholder is the executed person,whether the nominal shareholder can resist the execution,the people’s court should deal with it according to the circumstances.

关 键 词：代持股权 显名股东 隐名股东 异议之诉 权利外观 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]