检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢书好 王东 LU Shuhao;WANG Dong(Anhui Science and Technology University Fengyang,Anhui 233100;Anhui Zhiqiu Law Firm Chuzhou,Anhui 233100)
机构地区:[1]安徽科技学院,安徽凤阳233100 [2]安徽知秋律师事务所,安徽滁州233100
出 处:《中国商论》2022年第3期132-134,共3页China Journal of Commerce
摘 要:破产和解是破产制度中的重要分支制度之一,庭外和解以程序简捷、费用低、有效保护商业秘密等特点具有明显的制度优势。但我国当前破产案件的庭外和解中,存在着债权人基数大、难以达成一致、法律规定过于原则、公立监督和救济措施缺失等现实困境。通过完善庭外和解立法和救济渠道、建立第三方介入机制、法院严格进行破产识别审查、强化中小债权人利益保护等举措,能够为破产案件的庭外和解制度的有效适用提供出路。Bankruptcy reconciliation is one of the important branches of the bankruptcy system. Out-of-court reconciliation has obvious systematic advantages due to its simple procedures, low cost, and effective protection of business secrets. However, in the current out-of-court settlement of bankruptcy cases in China, there are realistic dilemmas such as the large base of creditors, hard to reach an agreement, the legal provisions are too principled, and the lack of public supervision and relief measures. Measures such as improving the legislation and relief channels for out-of-court settlements, establishing a third-party intervention mechanism, the court’s strictly reviewing bankruptcy identification and strengthening the protection of the interests of small and medium-sized creditors, can provide a way out for the effective application of the out-of-court settlement system in bankruptcy cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.226.34