审视与展望:诉讼价值论视域下的案卷移送制度比较论  

Review and Prospect:A Comparative Study on the System of File Transfer from the Perspective of Litigation Value

作　　者：吴畅[1] Wu Chang(Law Department,Hunan Judicial Police Vocational College,Changsha,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南司法警官职业学院法律系,湖南长沙410131

出　　处：《社会科学论坛》2022年第1期114-121,共8页Tribune of Social Sciences

摘　　要：案卷移送制度与其他诉讼制度一样,其确立是程序设计中价值选择和价值实现的结果,旨在实现多元的诉讼价值目的。以起诉书一本主义模式作比较研究,从程序的内在价值、外在价值以及经济效益价值三大诉讼价值维度,可以看出我国现行的全案移送主义在裁判中立性、程序对等性、程序合理性等程序正义价值上皆有明显缺陷,对于实现实体公正也并无明显优势,亦非审判效率之不可或缺,起诉书一本主义在我国司法环境中也“水土不服”。应探索中间道路,采取阶梯式案卷移送,以更好地实现诉讼程序内在与外在的善。Like other litigation systems,the establishment of file transfer system is the result of value selection and value realization in program design,which aims to achieve multiple litigation value purposes.Compared with the mode of“charge-statement-only”,from three dimensions of procedural value,i.e.,the intrinsic value,the external value and the economic benefit value of the procedure,we can see that there are obvious defects in the value of procedural justice,such as the neutrality of judgment,the equivalence of procedure,the rationality of procedure,and so on.It is indispensable.The doctrine of“charge-statement-only”is not suitable in China’s judicial environment.We should explore the middle way and adopt the ladder file transfer to realize the internal and external goodness of the litigation procedure.

关 键 词：案卷移送 全案移送主义 起诉书一本主义 诉讼价值 阶梯式案卷移送 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]