论“委托辩护应当优先法援辩护”原则  

A Preliminary Study on the Principle of“Attorney-Client Defense Prior to Legal Aid Defense”

作　　者：顾永忠[1] Gu Yongzhong

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学国家法律援助研究院

出　　处：《上海政法学院学报（法治论丛）》2022年第1期16-27,共12页Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)

基　　金：2020年度研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大项目“健全社会公平正义法治保障制度研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:(20ZDA032)。

摘　　要：委托辩护与法援辩护之关系,应当为委托辩护优先法援辩护。但是,近年来司法实践中出现了种种异常现象,被称为"占坑式法援"或"占坑式辩护",即用法援辩护排挤委托辩护。因此,在国际刑事司法准则的相关要求、我国刑事诉讼法及司法解释以往的有关规定精神的背景下,以我国第一部《法律援助法》的最新规定为依据,提出并论证了"委托辩护应当优先法援辩护"的原则,包括该原则的含义及其法理依据。在此基础上,透过多起典型案例,重点对因当事人亲属的代为委托和办案机关的通知引起同一案件中委托辩护与法援辩护的冲突问题展开分析,并提出解决思路和方案。The relationship between attorney-client defense and legal aid defense shall be that entrusted former defense has priority over the latter one.However,in recent years,there have been a variety of abnormal phenomena in judicial practice,known as“occupation-pit type legal aid”or“occupation-pit type defense”,that is,using legal aid defense to exclude attorney-client defense.Based on the requirements of international criminal justice standards and norms,the spirit of Criminal Procedure Law of our country and the previous relevant provisions on judicial interpretation,and the latest regulations of the first Legal Aid Law in China,this article puts forward and proves the principle of“the priority of attorney-client defense over legal aid defense”,including its meaning and legal basis.Therefore,through a number of cases,this paper focuses on the analysis of the conflict between attorney-client defense and legal aid defense in the same case caused by the entrustment on behalf of the party’s relatives and the notification of the case handling authorities.Meanwhile,ideas and solutions are also presented.

关 键 词：委托辩护 法援辩护 辩护人 当事人 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]