论庭前会议环节对控方证据的实质审查——以新《刑诉法解释》第232条为中心  

Substantive Review of the Prosecution’s Evidence in the Pretrial Session——Focus on the Article232 of the Interpretation by the Supreme People’s Court Regarding the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China

作　　者：孙远 Sun Yuan

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学法学院

出　　处：《上海政法学院学报（法治论丛）》2022年第1期119-132,共14页Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)

基　　金：2018年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国特色刑事证据理论体系研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:18ZDA139。

摘　　要：新《刑诉法解释》第232条在庭前会议阶段增加了对指控证据予以实质审查的因素,有助于维系控审之间的有效制约关系以及防止滥诉。此种审查并不会造成法庭审判的形式化,反而有可能对以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革发挥促进作用。法院应在司法实务中充分挖掘该条的潜力,推进我国实质化的庭前审查程序之建立与完善。此外,在庭前对控方证据展开实质审查的前提下,亦可进一步杜绝检察院在审判过程中以证据不足为由撤回起诉这种传统"陋习"。The Article 232 of the Interpretations by the Supreme People’s Court Regarding the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China adds the substantive review of the charged evidence to the pretrial session,which helps to maintain an effective restraint relationship between prosecution and trial,and also prevent frivolous lawsuits.Instead of causing the formalization of court trials,such review is actually conducive to in promoting the reformation of the trial-centered litigation system.The court should make full use of the potential of the Article 232 in judicial practice to improve the substantive pretrial examination procedure in China.In addition,on the premise of the substantive examination of the prosecution’s evidence,it can further put an end to the traditional wrong habit of prosecutors who may withdraw the prosecution in the trial process on the ground of insufficient evidence.

关 键 词：庭前会议 庭前审查 起诉条件 撤回起诉 

分 类 号：DF715[政治法律—诉讼法学]