基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的硕士研究生生源质量评价指标体系研究  

Quality evaluation index system of postgraduate students using Delphi technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process

作　　者：何其迅 马小蕊[2] 吴萍[1,3] He Qixun;Ma Xiaorui;Wu Ping(School of Public Health,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;Graduate School,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;Dean's Office,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学公共卫生学院,北京100069 [2]首都医科大学研究生院,北京100069 [3]首都医科大学教务处,北京100069

出　　处：《医学教育管理》2022年第1期101-105,126,共6页Medical Education Management

摘　　要：目的构建准确、有效、易操作的研究生生源质量评价体系,促进研究生教育健康发展。方法在利益相关者调查、文献研究及专家访谈的基础上,初步确定硕士研究生生源质量评价指标体系的一级、二级指标,运用德尔菲法进行两轮专家咨询最终确定硕士研究生生源质量评价指标,运用层次分析法计算评价指标权重。结果专家熟悉程度为0.8657、0.8648,判断依据为0.7457、0.7484,权威系数为0.8057、0.8314,Kendall协调系数为0.125、0.406 (P<0.001)。确定硕士研究生生源质量评价指标包括4项一级指标、14项二级指标。一级指标为成绩指标、背景结构、专业适配、综合素质,权重分别为0.42、0.23、0.23、0.12,判断矩阵的一致性比例(CR)为0.004,二级指标判断矩阵的(CR)分别为0.017、0.018、0.018、0。结论运用德尔菲法和层次分析法构建的硕士研究生生源质量评价指标体系及其权重较为科学,结果可信,可对研究生生源质量进行科学的诊断性评估,为研究生教育的培养、就业跟踪评价奠定了重要的基础作用。Objective To construct an accurate, effective and easy to operate quality evaluation system of postgraduate students to promote the healthy development of postgraduate education. Methods On the basis of stakeholder survey,literature research and expert interview, the primary and secondary indicators of the quality evaluation system of postgraduate students are preliminarily determined. Delphi technique was conducted to analyze the results and analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of evaluation index. Results The judgment, familiarity and authority coefficients as well as Kendall,s W were 0. 7457,0. 8657,0. 8057,and 0. 125,respectively,for the first round of expert consultation(P< 0. 001),and were 0. 7484,0. 8648,0. 8314,and 0. 406,respectively,for the second round of expert consultation(P<0. 001). The determined 4 index of quality evaluation of graduate students include achievement index, background structure, professional competence and comprehensive quality, with 0. 42,0. 23,0. 23,0. 12,as the corresponding weights,and 0. 004 as the consistency ratio of the judgment matrix. The consistency test of secondary index judgment matrix was 0. 017, 0. 018, 0. 018,and 0,respectively. Conclusion The quality evaluation of graduate students and its weight constructed by Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process are more scientific,and the results are credible. It can scientifically evaluate the graduate student source quality,and lays an important foundation for the training of postgraduate education and the follow-up evaluation of employment.

关 键 词：硕士研究生 生源质量 评价指标体系 权重 研究生管理 

分 类 号：G643[文化科学—高等教育学]