检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨晔 Yang Ye
机构地区:[1]海南大学法学院
出 处:《农业考古》2022年第1期106-116,共11页Agricultural Archaeology
摘 要:中国传统司法中调解手段虽受到推崇,但与古代诉讼形态中"健讼"的一面相矛盾。对传统乡村社会的纠纷解决模式的探析,从官方制度上看纵向的"回缩",并将司法案件与权威向上转移;而横向上因为集约化司法体制,以及导致纠纷繁多的外部因素,使得官方乐于刻画健讼形象与推崇调解手段。乡村纠纷解决的途径虽然呈现多元化特点,但横向上民间团体与地方权威受到官方势力的影响,调解的实际效用并不牢靠。总言之,官方矛盾的治理策略,造成乡村社会调解手段的"虚弱"局面。Although the mediation method in Chinese traditional judicature is highly respected, it contradicts the litigation in ancient litigation forms. The paper analyzes the dispute settlement mode of traditional rural society, explores the vertical retraction from the official system, and transfers the judicial cases and authority upward. Horizontally, because of the intensive judicial system and the external factors leading to many disputes, the officials were willing to depict the image of litigation and advocate mediation. Although there were diversified ways to solve rural disputes from the folk, the horizontal civil groups and local authorities were influenced by official forces, so the actual effectiveness of mediation was not reliable. The government’s contradictory governance strategy resulted in the "weak" situation of mediation means in rural society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13