粤港澳大湾区区际刑事司法协助制度的构建  

The Construction of Interregional Criminal Judicial Cooperation Regulation in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

作　　者：张亮 刘松涛 Zhang Liang;Liu Song-tao

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院 [2]南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海)

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2022年第1期136-146,共11页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

基　　金：深圳前海蛇口自贸区人民检察院(法治前海研究基地)委托课题“检察机关服务保障粤港澳大湾区建设”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：粤港澳大湾区区际刑事司法协助面临外部和内部双重障碍。外部障碍是三地规则差异显著、港澳地区的合作积极性较低、区际刑事管辖权协调规则缺位。内部障碍是各法域内部协助主体的工作衔接机制不完善。对比现有代表性的构建模式,"框架安排+附件"模式是构建粤港澳大湾区区际刑事司法协助制度的优选方案。"框架安排+附件"模式以国际环境法领域中的"框架协议+议定书+附件"为基础,充分借鉴了分阶段模式、窗口协议模式、类案协助协议模式的优点,具有界限清晰、包容性强、灵活实用等优点。"框架安排+附件"模式的具体落实,需厘清内地各司法机构的角色定位,明确《框架安排》中的基本原则,分阶段、分步骤推动《附件》的签署。There are two types of obstacles in the interregional criminal judicial cooperation relationship of The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. The external obstacles include Rules of the differences, whereas Hong Kong and Macao lacks impetus and absence in jurisdiction coordination rules. The internal obstacles is connection mechanism of participants. Compared to the representative construction mode, the“Framework agreement + Annex” model is a preferrable option for the construction of the interregional criminal judicial cooperation regulation in The Greater Bay Area. Based on the model of “framework agreement + Protocol + Annex” in the field of international environmental law, the model of “framework agreement + Annex” fully draws the advantages of progressive model, window model and typical case model and has the strengths of clear-principle, inclusiveness, flexibility and practicality. Following the implementation of the “framework arrangement + Annex” model, it is the proper chance to clarify the role of the mainland judiciary and the basic principles, as well as to promote the signing of the Annex gradually.

关 键 词：粤港澳大湾区 区际刑事司法协助 框架安排 附件 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D926[政治法律—法学]