检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴昌贤 薄岩 杜悦悦 周丰[1,2] WU Changxian;BO Yan;DU Yueyue;ZHOU Feng(College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100871;Laboratory for Earth Surface Process,Peking University,Beijing 100871)
机构地区:[1]北京大学,城市与环境学院,北京100871 [2]北京大学,地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室,北京100871
出 处:《环境科学学报》2022年第1期151-159,共9页Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(No.41977082,41561134016)。
摘 要:水资源的过度开发导致了水短缺和水生态退化,因此,提供适宜的生态流量对维护河流健康具有重要意义.以往研究聚焦断面尺度的生态流量及其保障程度,尚未有效剥离上游子流域的影响.本研究以松辽流域为研究对象,运用VMF法、Tessmann_(_adapted)法和Smakhtin_(_adapted)法3种水文学法核算二级水资源区生态流量及1956—2000年期间生态流量赤字,解析生态流量赤字的关键成因.结果表明:松花江和辽河流域的生态流量分别为(1869±402)m^(3)·s^(-1)和(554±81)m^(3)·s^(-1),均占天然流量的44%.其中松花江(三岔口以下)流域生态流量最大,东辽河流域生态流量最小.1956—2000年,松辽流域均出现生态流量赤字且逐年增加,辽河干流赤字情况最严重.气候变化和人类耗水分别是造成松花江流域和辽河流域生态流量赤字的主导因素.该研究对松辽流域生态流量确定和保障、水资源合理开发利用、水生态保护等具有重要现实意义.Overexploitation of limited freshwater resources has led to water scarcity,economic downturn,and ecological destruction.Ensuring suitable ecological flow requirements(EFR)is of great significance to maintaining river health and supporting the development of human society.Most existing studies focus intensively on the EFR of gauging stations and neglect the quantitative identification of influence from upstream watersheds.Taking Songliao River Basin as an example and 1956-2000 as the research period,we selected three hydrological methods in this study to analyze the EFR,EFR deficit,and its key drivers,including Tessmann_(_adapted) method,Smakhtin_(_adapted) method,and VMF method.Results show that the EFRs of Songhua River Basin and Liao River Basin were(1869±402)m^(3)·s^(-1) and(554±81)m^(3)·s^(-1),respectively,accounting for 44%of their natural flows.Songhua River(below Sanchakou)had the largest EFR while that of Songliao River was the smallest.The EFR deficit of Songliao River Basin showed an increasing trend during 1956-2000,with the deficit of Liao River’s mainstream being the most serious.Climate change was the main factor of the EFR deficit in Songhua River Basin while human water consumption had the most impact on EFR deficit in Liao River Basin.Our results are significant for water resources utilization,environment protection,and industrial and agricultural development.
关 键 词:生态流量 水文学法 生态流量赤字 人类耗水 气候变化 松辽流域
分 类 号:X17[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.225.144