辩护律师有效辩护的评价及其实现  

Evaluation on and Realization to Defense Lawyers'Procedural Defense Effective

作　　者：朱德宏 ZHU De-hong(Law School, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院,安徽芜湖241000

出　　处：《时代法学》2022年第1期62-70,共9页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“犯罪事实调查制度研究——新制度主义政治学的视域”(编号:18FFX061)的研究成果。

摘　　要：审判中心主义是一个刑事诉讼程序内的话语,在该话语体系中,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的辩护权有效行使是庭审实质化不可缺失的构成要素。我国《刑事诉讼法》第37条的规定是有效辩护的评价标准。评价主体是当事人和法律职业者。辩护律师有效辩护的评价标准,是律师诉讼程序的过程标准,而不是以案件的司法裁判结果为标准。可视性的辩护律师有效辩护的实现方式,是改革现行法庭审判程序的简单化运作模式,改革刑事判决书、裁定书对辩护律师辩护观点的评述,扩大庭审网络同步直播的案件范围,许可被告人以律师辩护无效为由提起上诉,许可辩护律师将未决案件争议点诉诸于公共领域,接受当事人和社会民众的检视。Trial centralism is a discourse in criminal process,in which the right of the suspect and the defendant to defense being effectively exercised is an indispensable component of trial materialization.Article 37 of the Criminal Procedure Law is the evaluation standard of effective defense.The subjects of evaluation should be litigants and legal professionals.The evaluation standard of lawyer's effective defense is the process standard of lawyer's litigation procedure,not the result standard of judicial judgment.The visual paths to implement effective defense would contain to reforming the simplification operation pattern of court trial procedure,and to reform comments of criminal judgments or orders on the lawyers'view.In addition,expanding on the scope of live webcast of network of case trial,permitting the defendant to appeal on the grounds that the lawyer defense is invalid,licensing lawyers about pending cases controversial points to appeal to the public domain in order to be scrutiny by the parties and the public,are the measures.

关 键 词：律师辩护权 律师执业权 有效辩护评价 有效辩护实现 

分 类 号：DF715[政治法律—诉讼法学]