功能型检察主导之理论提倡与司法展开  

Theoretical Advocacy and Judicial Application of Functional Procuratorial Leading

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈小彪[1] 王祥传 CHEN Xiao-biao;WANG Xiang-chuan(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science&Law,401120,Chongqing,China)

机构地区:[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出  处:《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第1期43-53,共11页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基  金:国家社科基金重点项目“认罪认罚从宽制度的刑法应对研究”(20AFX012)。

摘  要:公平正义价值的社会需要、轻罪渐次建构的现实,以及认罪认罚从宽制度的推行,三者共同催生了我国检察主导理论。但现有检察主导理论越发倾向“检察司法化”,具体表现为于外援引西方看似具有历史必然性的“检察裁判权”既有范式,于内泛化法律监督职能的实际效用,以致撕裂“以审判为中心”和“检察主导”之间的客观联系。在中国司法语境和现行刑事诉讼模式构造之下,现有理论必然遭遇脱离文本的含义解读、诉讼模式的运行冲突、法治语境的制约失衡三重困境。因此,必须回归刑事诉讼结构本身,检察主导理论功能的证成也应遵循三个方面的要求:由权力分配的绝对走向功能主导的相对、从形式过程主导走向实质公正价值保障、从机械式程序衔接环节走向体系功能优化。The social needs of fairness and justice,the reality of the gradual construction of misdemeanor,and the implementation of the leniency system for confessing guilt and confessing willingness to receive penalty have all together gave birth to the procuratorial leading theory in China.However,the current theory is increasingly inclined to the practice of“procuratorial judicialization”.The specific manifestation is that from the exterior it often cites the paradigm of western“procuratorial jurisdiction”,which seems to have historical inevitability,and from the interior it makes too general use of practical effectiveness of legal supervision,thus separating the objective connection between“trial-centered”and“procuratorial leading”.Under the Chinese judicial context and the structure of current criminal procedure model,this theory will inevitably encounter a triple dilemma,that is,interpreting being separated from the original text,operation conflict of the litigation model,and the imbalance of the legal context.Therefore,it is necessary to return to the criminal procedure structure itself,and the functional justification of the procuratorial leading theory should also follow three requirements:the essence of the procuratorial leading theory changes from the absolute power distribution to function leading,the formal process leading changes to substantive justice value guarantee,and the mechanical processing linking changes towards system function optimization.

关 键 词:认罪认罚从宽制度 检察主导 审判中心 检察官司法 刑事诉讼模式 

分 类 号:D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D926.3[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象