《民法典》背景下代位权客体廓清  

On Clarification of Subrogation Right’s Object in Civil Code

作　　者：赵晶 Zhao Jing(School of Civil and Economics Law,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou,Henan 450046)

机构地区：[1]河南财经政法大学民商经济法学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2022年第2期27-36,共10页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：立法与理论上关于代位权客体的争议一直存在,此种分歧在《民法典》颁布实施后依然持续,有损于《民法典》的实施与法治的统一。在确定代位权客体的问题上,我们应该明确代位权制度的立法目的在于“债权人利益保护”,且“不过分侵夺债务人私法自治”,因此,在“秉持谦抑性”等原则的基础上,可将代位权客体界定为“一般债权”“债权之从权利”“增加责任财产之必要权利”“确定性的特殊金融债权”等。Legislative and theoretical disputes on the object of subrogation rights have always existed.The disputes still remain after the promulgation and implementation of China’s Civil Code,which damages the implementation of the Civil Code and the unity of the rule of law.On determining object of subrogation rights,we should clarify the legislative purpose of the subrogation system as“protection of creditor’s rights”and“not invade the autonomy of obligator excessively”.On the basis of the principle of“modesty”,we can define the object of subrogation right as“ordinary creditor’s rights”,“accession right”,“necessary right to enhance the obligator’s fortune”and“certain special financial claims”.

关 键 词：民法典 代位权客体 债权人利益保护 一般债权 从权利 特殊金融债权 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]