经皮冷冻消融联合无水酒精注射治疗70岁以上老年肝细胞癌患者的效果及安全性分析  

Clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous cryoablation combined with percutaneous ethanol injection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma aged 70 years or older

作　　者：罗婧 吕采红 杨永平[1,2] LUO Jing;LYU Caihong;YANG Yongping(Peking University 302 Clinical Medical School,Beijing 100039,China;Faculty of Liver Disease,The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100039,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学三〇二临床医学院,北京100039 [2]解放军总医院第五医学中心肝病医学部,北京100039

出　　处：《临床肝胆病杂志》2022年第2期365-371,共7页Journal of Clinical Hepatology

基　　金：国家“十三五”科技重大专项(2018ZX10725506)。

摘　　要：目的探讨经皮冷冻消融(CRYO)联合无水酒精注射(PEI)对早期老年肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性纳入解放军总医院第五医学中心2014年1月—2018年1月收治的92例老年肝细胞癌患者,其中单一CRYO治疗组46例,CRYO联合PEI(联合治疗)组46例。比较两种治疗方式的效果,不良反应及治疗前后肝功能相关指标的变化,并随访患者肿瘤的复发及生存预后情况。正态分布的计量资料两组间比较用t检验;非正态分布的计量资料两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U秩和检验。计数资料两组间比较采用χ^(2)检验。两组的生存时间采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,并用log-rank检验生存曲线的差异;通过Cox回归法确定影响生存预后的独立危险因素。结果联合治疗组和CRYO组初次消融的有效率分别为89.1%和73.9%,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CRYO组和联合治疗组患者术后总生存率和无瘤生存率间的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05),但联合治疗组患者术后第1、2和3年局部肿瘤进展率分别为20%、21%和21%,明显低于CRYO组的30%、46%、46%(χ2=4.187,P<0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析提示行单一CRYO治疗可能是局部肿瘤进展率的独立危险因素(HR=2.206,95%CI:1.003~4.850,P=0.049)。在不良反应的发生率上两组间差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05),但CRYO组有3例严重不良反应,联合治疗组未出现严重不良反应。结论对于早期老年肝细胞癌患者,CRYO联合PEI治疗较单纯CRYO治疗安全有效,能明显降低局部肿瘤进展率。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous cryoablation combined with percutaneous ethanol injection(PEI)in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma aged 70 years or older.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 92 elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were admitted to The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2014 to January 2018,among whom 46 underwent cryoablation alone(CRYO group)and 46 underwent cryoablation combined with PEI(combination therapy group).The two groups were compared in terms of clinical outcome,adverse reactions,and changes in liver function parameters after treatment,and the patients were followed up to observe tumor recurrence and survival.The t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between two groups,and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between two groups;the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups.The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis,and the log-rank test was used for comparison of survival curves.The Cox regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for survival and prognosis.Results There was no significant difference in the response rate of initial ablation between the combination therapy group and the CRYO group(89.1%vs 73.9%,P>0.05).There were no significant differences between the CRYO group and the combination therapy group in overall survival time and tumor-free survival rate after surgery(P>0.05),and compared with the CRYO group,the combination therapy group had significantly lower 1-,2-,and 3-year local tumor progression rates(20%/21%/21%vs 30%/46%/46%,χ^(2)=4.187,P<0.05).The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that cryoablation alone might be an independent risk factor for local tumor progression(HR=2.206,95%CI:1.003-4.850,P=0.049).There was no significant difference in the incidenc

关 键 词：癌 肝细胞 导管消融术 乙醇 注射 病灶内 

分 类 号：R735.7[医药卫生—肿瘤]