受教育权的功能体系与法典化进路  

The Functional System and the Path to Codification of the Right to Education

作　　者：谭家超 Tan Jiachao

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学马克思主义学院,武汉430079

出　　处：《新文科教育研究》2022年第1期59-74,142,143,共18页NEW LIBERAL ARTS EDUCATION RESEARCH

基　　金：教育部2021年度高校思想政治理论课教师研究专项重大课题攻关项目“建党百年思政课建设的历史经验与发展规律研究”(编号:21JDSZKZ02)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：基于受教育权的根本属性建立一套功能化的理论体系,不仅对教育法学的发展具有很强的影响力,而且对教育法典化具有重要的指导意义。参照德国的基本权利理论,结合中国的宪法功能与实践,可以将受教育权的客观价值秩序功能采取客观化阐释和支点化运用,并在此基础上进行功能体系重构。其中,制度性保障功能占据基础性地位,主要表现是通过立法形成相关受教育的保障制度,而教育法典化对提升这种制度保障水平具有开创意义。与此同时,组织和程序保障与制度性保障相辅相成,对相关规则进行系统整合也属于教育法典化的重要任务。最后,辐射至私人领域的第三人效力理论对完善受教育权的客观价值秩序功能体系至关重要,也需要在教育法典化过程中进行相关创设。The establishing of a functional theoretical system based on the fundamental attributes of the right to education has not only had a strong influence on the development of education jurisprudence, but also had important directional significance for the codification of education. Referring to the German theory of fundamental rights and combining with China’s constitutional functions and practices, we can adopt an objective interpretation and pivotal application of the objective value order function of the right to education and reconstruct the functional system on this basis. In this system, the function of institutional safeguards occupies a fundamental position, which is mainly manifested in the shaping of the respective educational system through legislation, and the codification of education is of seminal importance in strengthening this function. At the same time, organizational and procedural safeguards complemented by institutional safeguards to systematically integrate relevant regulations is also one of the important tasks in codification of education. Finally, the theory of third-party effect, which has radiated into the private sphere, plays a crucial role in improving the functional system of objective value order of the right to education, and is also necessarily created in the process of codification of education.

关 键 词：受教育权 教育法典化 客观价值秩序 功能体系 宪法权利 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]