检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁文杰 Ding Wenjie
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院
出 处:《中外法学》2022年第1期242-260,共19页Peking University Law Journal
摘 要:现行著作权法条文的构造具有浓厚的自然权理论色彩,重视对著作人身权的保护,且在处理著作财产权时拘泥于物权构造。静态思维的权利范式缺乏体系化思维,将著作权误解为对作品这一无体"物"享有的权利。然而,著作权的本质是行为规制,其对私人行动自由的限制程度较高。因此,著作权法的思维方式也需要从静态思维的权利范式转向动态思维的行为规制范式。动态思维的行为规制范式,既可以纠正政策形成过程中的利益倾斜问题,也可以弥补著作权法条文与使用者普遍认知之间的偏差。The structure of the prevailing copyright law is firmly based on the classical theory of natural rights,attaching importance to personality rights,and adhering to the system of real rights when dealing with property rights.The rights paradigm of static conception lacks systematic consideration,and it misunderstands copyright as the right to the incorporeal“thing”.However,the essence of copyright is behavior regulation,and it restricts the freedom of private actions.Therefore,the conception of copyright law needs to change from the static paradigm of rights to the dynamic paradigm of behavior regulation.The behavioral regulation paradigm with dynamic conception can redress the interest-centric problem in the process of policy formation and make up the discrepancy between provisions of the copyright law and users’general awareness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49