检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈勇[1] Chen Yong
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学人文学院哲学系
出 处:《东南学术》2022年第2期163-170,248,共9页Southeast Academic Research
摘 要:“世界”不仅是一个日常生活概念,也是一个重要的哲学概念,但它的合法性却不断遭受着质疑。当代德国哲学家加布里埃尔提出的新实在论主张,各种事物都存在,但世界不存在。康德也持有类似观点,在《纯粹理性批判》中他对理性宇宙论提出了批评,并将“世界”规定为一个理性理念,认为它只具有实践意义,而不具有理论意义。海德格尔的生存论解释学一方面继承了康德关于“世界”概念的规定,另一方面则将“世界”规定为一种可显现者,这意味着对于“世界”这一哲学概念的合法性的承认。The “world” is not only a concept in daily life,but also an important philosophical concept,but its legitimacy is constantly being questioned. The neo-realism proposed by the contemporary German philosopher Gabriel asserts that all things exist but the world does not. Kant holds a similar view and criticizes rational cosmology in his Critique of Pure Reason. He defines the “world” as a rational idea,which has practical rather than theoretical significance. Heidegger’s survivalist hermeneutics inherits Kant’s definition of the world concept on the one hand,but on the other hand he defines the world as a manifestation,which means his recognition of the legitimacy of the philosophical concept of the “world”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222