检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任鹏 REN Peng(School of Law, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)
机构地区:[1]新疆财经大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830012
出 处:《河南科技学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第3期65-71,共7页Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“反恐地方立法的优化研究”(20BFX061),主持人:沈子华。
摘 要:禁令是商业秘密已经被侵权或有侵权的可能时较有效的救济措施。在我国商业秘密虽长期被作为专利保护的补充,但其具有专利所不具有的特殊的法律属性。理论界和实务界已经认识到这种差异,并在对外开放和交往中不断完善法律规范。在商业秘密立法保护措施完善的历程中,也加深了对其特殊法律属性的认识。通过分析我国商业秘密禁令制度的适用现状,从商业秘密保护的诉前和诉中禁令入手进行区分,完善禁令对商业秘密保护的作用,建立起一种迅速的事前救济和有效的事后保障机制,通过保护商业秘密优化我国营商环境。Injunction is a more effective remedy measure when trade secrets have been infringed or are likely to be infringed.In China,trade secret has been a supplement to patent protection for a long time,but it has special legal attributes that patent does not have.The theoretical and practical circles have recognized this difference,and constantly improve the legal norms in the opening up and exchanges with the outside world.In the course of witnessing the perfection of the legislative protection measures for trade secrets,we have also deepened our profound understanding of its special legal attributes.By analyzing the application status of the trade secret prohibition system in China,this paper distinguishes the pre-litigation and in-litigation prohibition of trade secret protection,improves the role of the prohibition on trade secret protection,establishes a quick pre-litigation relief and an effective post-litigation safeguard mechanism,and optimizes the business environment in China through the protection of trade secret.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49