法官惩戒程序的刑事诉讼法反思——以王成忠案为例  

Reflect on the Criminal Procedure Law Based on the Judges?Disciplinary Procedure——Take Wang Chengzhong’Case as an Example

作　　者：杨博闻 潘欣竹 Yang Bowen;Pan Xinzhu(People’s Procuratorate of Pudong New Area,Shanghai 200135,China;Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)

机构地区：[1]上海市浦东新区人民检察院检察八部,上海200135 [2]上海海事大学,上海201306

出　　处：《上海公安学院学报》2022年第1期76-85,共10页Journal of Shanghai Police College

摘　　要：结合王成忠案相关的程序问题,联系司法改革新背景的规范性文件,结合《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》《中华人民共和国法官法》《中华人民共和国监察法》具体制度和相关原则,对法官惩戒的程序进行思考,认为法官惩戒制度和刑事诉讼程序、监察程序衔接不足,且存在法官惩戒委员会作用不明、法官权益保障困难的情况,从认为检察机关和监察委员会应该谨慎启动责任追究,进一步发挥法官惩戒委员会、法官权益保障委员会作用,保障法官群体的合法权益.By referring to the procedural issues related to Wang Chengzhong’s case,the normative documents in the new background of judicial reform,the specific systems and related principles of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China,the Judges’Law of the People’s Republic of China and the Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China,the author thinks that the alignment between the judges’disciplinary system,the criminal procedure and the supervision procedure is insufficient,and the roles of the judges’disciplinary committee are unclear.Furthermore,it is difficult to guarantee judges’rights and interests.It is considered that procuratorates and supervisory committees should be careful in launching their investigation into responsibilities,and that the judges’disciplinary committee and the judges’rights and interests protection committee should play more roles so as to protect their legitimate rights and interests.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼法 法官惩戒制度 监察法 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]