《民法典》视阈下医疗损害责任探讨  

Discussion on the Liability of Medical Dispute Damage from the Perspective of Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China

作　　者：薛涛[1] 吕惠聪 曹亮[1] 郭艳 史静丹 刘扬[1] Xue Tao;Lv Huicong;Cao Liang;Guo Yan;Shi Jingdan;Liu Yang(Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050017,China)

机构地区：[1]河北医科大学,石家庄050017

出　　处：《中国卫生法制》2022年第2期29-33,共5页China Health Law

基　　金：2017年度河北省社会科学发展研究课题(学术年会专项)“《侵权责任法》视阈下医疗纠纷损害责任探讨”(201710120904)。

摘　　要：《民法典》第七编侵权责任部分的内容总体上承继了《侵权责任法》对医疗损害责任的相关规定,仅对个别字词进行了修改,明确了定义类型、举证责任、归责原则、赔偿标准和免责情形,这些规定推动了我国医疗损害赔偿制度的完善。但是,该法律在过度医疗、过错推定等方面仍然存在一些缺陷,需要进一步探讨和完善。讨论《民法典》侵权责任编中关于医疗损害赔偿责任的有关规定,确认其优点,明确问题,分析原因并提出了针对性的对策,以推动医疗损害赔偿的相关法律规定能够更好地协调医患之间的责任,既维护患者的权益,又保持社会和谐,促进司法体系更加健全。After the Civil Code issued,the seventh Ed Tort Liability part inherited the vast majority of the Tort Liability Law related the content of medical damage compensation responsibility,only for the individual words were modified,still clearly defined types,the burden of proof,the principle of attribution,compensation standards and exceptions.This structure has promoted the development of the liability for medical damages in China,but there are still some defects in the law in the aspects of excessive medical treatment,presumption of fault and determination of legitimate sources,which need to be further explored and improved.The authors discussed Articles of medical damage compensation responsibility in the part of Tort Liability of the Civil Code,confirmed its advantage,identified the problem,analyzed the reasons and put forward some corresponding countermeasures,in order to ensure the medical damage compensation responsibility to the relevant provisions of the better able to coordinate doctors’ responsibility,safeguard the rights and interests of patients,and maintain social harmony and promote the judicial system more comprehensive.

关 键 词：侵权责任 医疗损害归责原则 归责原则 

分 类 号：D902[政治法律—法学理论]