检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐俊[1,2] 徐祖祥[1] TANG Jun;XU Zuxiang(School of Sociology, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming 650091, China;International Cooperation and Exchange Office, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming 650091, China)
机构地区:[1]云南民族大学社会学院,云南昆明650091 [2]云南民族大学国际合作交流处,云南昆明650091
出 处:《云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第2期104-111,共8页Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“滇黔桂边区壮、瑶、苗诸族道教发展与民俗文化互构关系研究”(19AZJ006)阶段成果。
摘 要:乡村治理是国家治理的重要基础,是实现国家治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的基层工程。少数民族地区传统文化的现代价值重塑,是推进基层治理体系,完善基层治理机制的内在需要。桂西南壮族地区传统文化与乡村治理的多维耦合空间,表征出“文化空间”“空间表征”“象征秩序”三个维度的空间生产特性。在新时代“共建共治共享”社会治理制度,“自治法治德治”结合的基层治理体系中,乡村治理中的个体实践能动性、内在价值动能性和社会互动礼俗性,诠释出了地方传统在乡村治理中的价值重塑效能。Rural governance is an important foundation for our national governance and a grassroots project to modernize China's governance system and capacity.The reconstruction of the modern value of traditional culture in minority areas is the internal requirement of promoting the grassroots governance system and improving the grassroots governance mechanism.The multi-dimensional coupling space between traditional culture and rural governance in southwest Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region represents the spatial production characteristics of three dimensions:“cultural space”,“spatial representation”and“symbolic order”.In the new era,the social governance system of“co-construction,co-governance and sharing”and the grassroots governance system of“autonomy,rule of law and morality”,individual initiative in practice,dynamics of intrinsic value and social interaction etiquette in rural governance reveal the efficiency of the local tradition in the value reconstruction in rural governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.200.151