“案多人少”的成因与出路——对本轮民事诉讼法修正之省思  

Causes of "Too Many Cases and Too Few People" and the Way Out

作　　者：任重[1] REN Zhong

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院

出　　处：《法学评论》2022年第2期138-141,共4页Law Review

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“民事诉权基础理论研究”(项目编号:17CFX065)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要："诉讼爆炸"和"案多人少"是我国法官的直观感受,其也逐渐成为理论界的关注热点和立论基础。"诉讼爆炸"虽能得到统计学支持,但并不构成"案多人少"的主要原因。与德国数据相比,我国不存在显著的"案多"问题。《民法典》的正确实施预计将带来民事案件数量的进一步攀升。"案多人少"缘起于法官员额制改革在短期内引发的"人少"。本次修法集中于"人"以及"人案关系"的程序简化,"案"较为遗憾地在本论修法中失语。在法官员额短期内无法骤增,而当事人民事程序权利保障尚不充分的背景下,最大限度整合解决"案多",是科学化解"案多人少"的必由之路。"Litigation explosion" and "more cases and fewer judges" are the intuitive feelings of Chinese judges, and have gradually become the focus and basis of theoretical circles. Although "litigation explosion" can be statistically supported, it does not constitute the main reason for "more cases and fewer judges". Compared with German data, there is no significant problem of "more cases" in China. The correct implementation of the civil code is expected to lead to a further increase in the number of civil cases. "More cases and fewer judges" stems from the "fewer people" caused by the reform of the judge post system in the short term. This amendment focuses on the simplification of "person" and "relationship between person and case". Unfortunately, the "case" is silent in this amendment. Under the background that the number of judge posts can not be increased in a short time, and the protection of civil procedural rights of the parties is not enough, to integrate and solve "many cases" to the greatest extent is an ideal solution to solve "many cases and few people" scientifically.

关 键 词：诉讼爆炸 案多人少 法官员额制 独任制 小额程序 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]