检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤维建[1,2] TANG Weijian
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心
出 处:《中国政法大学学报》2022年第1期38-49,共12页Journal Of CUPL
摘 要:本文探讨了类似必要共同诉讼这种介于固有必要共同诉讼和普通共同诉讼之间的新型的共同诉讼形态,主张我国将来修改《民事诉讼法》时,应当导入和确认类似必要共同诉讼制度。这不仅是适应以《民法典》为核心的民事实体法不断发展的需要,而且是丰富和完善我国共同诉讼制度的内容和体系,适应司法实践确保程序公正和实体公正的需要,更是尊重和保护当事人的程序选择权,弱化法院依职权追加当事人的权限,推动我国民事诉讼模式从职权主义向当事人主义深化发展和制度转型的需要。As a new form of joint action,similar necessary joint action has some contents and characteristics of both inherent necessary joint action and common joint action,and it is relatively independent in system construction.When amending the Civil Procedure Law in the future,China should introduce and confirm the similar necessary joint action,which not only meets the needs of the continuous development of the civil substantive law with the Civil Code as its core,but also enriches and improves the content and system of China’s joint action system.In addition,the introduction and confirmation of the similar necessary joint action meets the needs of judicial practice to ensure procedural justice and substantive justice.What’s more,it also satisfies the demand respecting and protecting the parties’ right of procedure choice,weakening the court’s authority to add the parties according to its authority,and promoting the further development and systemic transformation of China’s civil litigation mode from an inquisitorial system to an adversary one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7