检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范晓波[1] 谭平芳 吴涛 Fan Xiaobo;Tan Pingfang;Wu Tao
机构地区:[1]北京化工大学文法学院
出 处:《电子知识产权》2022年第2期91-100,共10页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:我国对商业秘密的保护多是从实体法的角度出发,较少涉及诉讼程序的层面,商业秘密在诉讼程序中被泄露的风险很大。最高法院新发布的两个司法解释虽然增加了诉讼程序中商业秘密保护的规定,但仍然存在规定不明确、不具体、不全面的问题。以法院裁定形式发布的保密令是保护诉讼中商业秘密最为有效的措施,不仅有利于实现证据充分披露以发现真实,也有利于实现商业秘密保护与公正裁判之间的平衡。我国应构建依当事人申请启动,法院进行合理性审查,设置程序保障和法律责任的保密令制度,以完善诉讼中商业秘密的保护。In China,legislation of trade secret protection is mos tly concerned with substantial law,and rarely involves litigation procedure.Consequently,trade secrets are at high risk of disclosure during litigation.Although two new judicial interpretations issued by the Supreme Court had added provisions on the protection of trade secrets in litigation,those provisions are still unspecified,vague and incomplete.Protective order w hich is issued in the form of court rulings is the most ef fective measure to protect trade secrets disclosed in litigation.It is not only conducive to the full disclosure of evidence to fi nd truth,but also helpful to achieve the balance between trade secrets protection and fair judgment.In order to perfect the protection of the trade secrets disclosed during litigation,China should build a comprehensive protective order system.Protective order should be requested by parties,decided by the court in its discretion,and guaranteed by relevant procedures and legal liability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.247.147