检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕子逸 LV Zi-yi
机构地区:[1]吉林大学
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2022年第1期87-99,共13页Journal of Sichuan Police College
摘 要:公安机关侦查活动内部制约机制的设置,既是侦查活动中人权保障的需要,也是公安机关在此阶段主导地位影响下的发展趋势。然而,内部制约机制主体、方式和范围设置等层面的缺陷,在相当程度上削弱了这一机制的运作效果。在2020年《公安机关办理刑事案件程序规定》第三次修订的背景下,应以内部制约主体集中化、方式体系化和范围完整化为改革方向,对这一机制的完善提出较为可取的建议,以保障侦查环节的正当、有效进行,促进公安机关依法履职目标的实现以及刑事诉讼整体改革的推进。The establishment of internal restraint mechanism for investigation activities of public security organs is not only the need of human rights protection,but also the measure to ensure the legitimacy of the dominant position of public security organs in the investigation stage.However,the defects in the main body,mode and scope of the mechanism weaken the operation effect to a considerable extent.Under the background of the third revision of Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs in 2020,the mechanism should be reformed with the direction of centralized main body,systemized methods and completed scope,so as to ensure the proper and effective investigation,urge public security organs to perform their duties according to law and promote overall reform of criminal proceedings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33