检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫宇晨 Yan Yuchen
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学
出 处:《国家图书馆学刊》2022年第1期106-112,F0003,共8页Journal of The National Library of China
摘 要:数字时代下,文本数据挖掘技术的广泛应用对我国智慧图书馆的建设意义重大。但文本数据挖掘是否属于著作权例外这一问题引起国内外学界、实务界广泛争议,也给图书馆新技术的应用带来了一定的侵权风险。本文对近年域外相关制度改革进行梳理与反思,发现相关做法不具备法律移植的必要性与可行性;对文本数据挖掘的行为本质进一步分析发现,可以在著作权法框架下寻求一种“二分式”的侵权判断法,正确认定我国图书馆文本数据挖掘行为合法性问题,从而推动数字经济发展。表1。图1。参考文献24。In the digital age, the wide application of text data mining technology is of great significance to the construction of smart library in China. However, whether text data mining belongs to copyright exception has aroused widespread controversy in academic and practical circles at home and abroad, and also brought infringement risks to the application of new library technologies. This article reviews and reflects the relevant extraterritorial system reforms in recent years, and finds out that the relevant practices do not yet have the necessity and feasibility of legal transplantation. A further analysis of the essence of text data mining found a “dichotomous” infringement judgment method within the framework of the copyright law, which can correctly identify the legitimacy of the text data mining of libraries in China, thereby promoting the development of digital economy. 1 tab. 1 fig. 24 refs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.188.218