检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李茨婷[1]
机构地区:[1]上海外国语大学
出 处:《复旦外国语言文学论丛》2021年第2期9-17,共9页Fudan Forum on Foreign Languages and Literature
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(项目号:2020BYY019)资助。
摘 要:本研究采用社会网络分析理论和方法,考察两名在华国际学生个体社会网络构建与语用选择之间的交互变化。基于汉语语用产出、社会网络问卷、民族志访谈及观察等数据,研究发现同质化社会网络具有不同的网络密度,体现出差异性网络特征,很大程度影响着汉语语用选择,语用自主性在社会化过程中起到了中介调控作用。笔者呼吁未来语用研究或可考虑采用混合社会网络设计,丰富现有研究成果。Drawing on social network analysis as both theory and method,the present study explored the dynamic interactions between two international students’individual social network and their pragmatic choices during their study in China.Multiple data sources were collected from their pragmatic production in Chinese as well as social network questionnaire combined with ethnographic interviews and observations.The findings reveal that homogenized social networks with different densities may result in differential network features,which impacts on learners’Chinese pragmatic choices;pragmatic subjectivity plays a mediating role during their socialization process.The study concluded with the call for future pragmatics research to incorporate mixed-method social network design in order to expand the empirical scope.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.141.17