检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张威 Zhang Wei
机构地区:[1]郑州轻工业大学政法学院,河南郑州450002
出 处:《法学杂志》2022年第2期147-157,共11页Law Science Magazine
基 金:河南省哲学社会科学规划一般项目“腐败亚文化问题研究”(项目编号:2020BFX018)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:认罪认罚从宽制度虽然已经上升为法律制度,但仍然需要在具体的实践中逐步完善。立足于刑事一体化视野,可以在准确明晰认罪认罚从宽制度核心逻辑的基础上检视其实践误区。认罪认罚从宽制度在实践中面临着整体效率与个案公正之惑、形式与实质之困、人身危险性之难、如何从宽之谜等四大难题。在准确定位认罪认罚从宽制度的基础上,平衡个案公正与整体效率的关系,提升被害人的参与程度,完善人身危险性评估,构建科学透明的从宽标准体系。Although the system of pleas of guilty and acceptance of punishment with leniency has become a legal system,it still needs to be gradually improved in specific practice.Based on the perspective of criminal integration theory,the internal core logic of the system of pleas of guilty and acceptance of punishment with leniency can be clearly defined,and it can be used to examine the errors in practice.From the perspective of criminal integration theory,the practice of this system is faced with Four Misunderstandings:the confusion of efficiency and justice,the difficulty of form and substance,and the difficulty of personal risk and the mystery of how to leniency.On the basis of further positioning the system,we need to balance the relationship between case justice and overall efficiency,improve the participation of victims,improve personal risk assessment,and improve the leniency standard system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249