检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许妙纯 霍楚莹 吴斌[1] 凌小婷[1] 徐国才[1] 林仲秋[1] 卢淮武[1] XU Miao-chun;HUO Chu-ying;WU Bin;LING Xiao-ting;XU Guo-cai;LIN Zhong-qiu;LU Huai-wu(Department of Gynecological Oncology,Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120.China)
机构地区:[1]中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院妇科肿瘤科,广东广州510120
出 处:《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》2022年第2期201-205,共5页Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81972433);逸仙临床研究培育项目(SYS-C-202001)。
摘 要:目的探讨改良腹腔镜根治性子宫颈切除术在早期子宫颈癌保留生育功能中的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析2017年6月至2020年10月在中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院妇科肿瘤科接受传统腹腔镜(13例)和改良腹腔镜(12例)根治性子宫颈切除术+盆腔淋巴结切除术的早期子宫颈癌患者的临床资料,比较两组临床病理特征、手术情况、术后并发症、妊娠情况及肿瘤结局。结果改良腹腔镜组和传统腹腔镜组的临床病理资料、手术情况及术后并发症发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。传统腹腔镜组随访时间长于改良腹腔镜组(37.0个月vs.14.5个月,P<0.05)。改良腹腔镜组中有妊娠计划者4例,成功妊娠者3例(3/4),而传统腹腔镜组中有妊娠计划者4例,成功妊娠者仅1例(1/4),差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组在中位随访时间29个月内,均未见复发和死亡病例,无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)均为100%。结论改良腹腔镜根治性子宫颈切除术在保留生育功能的早期子宫颈癌患者中的应用安全可行,是否能进一步改善肿瘤结局和妊娠率,还需大样本随机对照试验进一步证实。Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of modified laparoscopic radical trachelectomy to preserve fertility in early-stage cervical cancer.Methods The clinical data,including pathological data,perioperative results,complications,pregnancy and oncological outcomes,were retrospectively analyzed and compared in 25 patients with early-stage cervical cancer,who underwent traditional laparoscopic radical trachelectomy(TLRT,n=13)and modified laparoscopic radical trachelectomy(MLRT,n=12)plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in the Department of Gynecological Oncology,Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 2017 to October 2020.Results There was no significant difference in clinical pathological characteristics,perioperative results or incidence of complications between MLRT group and TLRT group(P>0.05). The follow-up time in the TRTL group was longer than that in the MLRT group(37.0 months vs. 14.5 months,P<0.05). In the MLRT group,there were 4 cases of pregnancy plan and 3 cases of successful pregnancy(75%),while in TLRT group,there were 4 cases of pregnancy plan and only 1 case of successful pregnancy(25%),and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). During the median follow-up period of 29 months,there was no recurrence or death in both groups,and the disease-free survival rate(DFS)and overall survival rate(OS)were both 100%.Conclusion The application of MLRT in early-stage cervical cancer is safe and feasible,and whether it can further improve the tumor outcome and pregnancy rate needs to be further confirmed by large randomized controlled trials.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.221.185