环境规制、偏向性技术进步与能源效率  

Environmental Regulation,Directed Technical Change and Energy Efficiency

作　　者：叶红雨[1] 李奕杰 YE Hongyu;LI Yijie(Business School,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China)

机构地区：[1]上海理工大学管理学院,上海200093

出　　处：《华东经济管理》2022年第4期97-106,共10页East China Economic Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目“基于技术创新能力的中国制造业并购协同机理及实现路径研究”(71371124)。

摘　　要：文章通过偏向性技术进步模型,对环境规制影响能源效率的效应开展理论阐释和实证研究,为环境规制、技术进步以及能源效率的关系做出更一般的解释。结果表明:偏向性技术进步在“能源/资本”之间呈现节能效应,而在“能源/劳动”之间表现为能源回弹效应;正式环境规制通过影响技术进步偏向,扩大技术进步对能源效率的影响,而非正式环境规制能够直接提高能源效率;边际效用弹性负向调节了节能偏向性技术进步与能源效率的关系,具有放大能源回弹效应的作用。文章最后为中国工业可持续发展提供了建议。This paper uses a directed technical change model to carry out theoretical interpretation and empirical research on the effects of environmental regulations on energy efficiency,and make a more general explanation of the relationship among environmental regulation,technical change,and energy efficiency.The results show that the directed technical change has an energy-saving effect between“energy/capital”,and an energy rebound effect between“energy/labor”re⁃ducing energy efficiency;formal environmental regulations enlarge the impact of technological progress on energy efficien⁃cy by amplifying the bias of technical change,while informal environmental regulations directly improves energy efficien⁃cy;elasticity of marginal utility negatively moderates the relationship between energy-saving technical change and total factor energy efficiency,and amplifies the energy rebound effect.Finally,this paper provides suggestions for the sustain⁃able development of China's industry.

关 键 词：偏向性技术进步 正式环境规制 非正式环境规制 全要素能源效率 

分 类 号：X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学] F206[经济管理—国民经济]