检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李枭 王连飞 程刚 LI Xiao;WANG Lianfei;CHENG Gang(School of Stomatology,Bengbu Medical University,Bengbu 233030,China;Department of Stomatology,The First People's Hospital of Linan District,Hangzhou 310014,China;Department of Stomatology,Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,China)
机构地区:[1]蚌埠医学院口腔医学院,安徽蚌埠233030 [2]临安区第一人民医院口腔科,浙江杭州310014 [3]浙江省人民医院口腔科,浙江杭州310014
出 处:《口腔疾病防治》2022年第6期412-418,共7页Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
基 金:浙江省自然科学基金项目(LGF18H140006);浙江省医药卫生科技项目(2022KY505)。
摘 要:目的 从临床及组织形态计量学角度评价浓缩生长因子(concentrated growth factor,CGF)联合脱蛋白牛骨基质(deproteinated bovine bone mineral,DBBM)在拔牙位点保存中成骨效果。方法 选取需拔除患牙并接受位点保存后延期种植的26例患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将患者分为DBBM组和CGF+DBBM组,每组13例。DBBM组拔牙后同期植入DBBM,CGF+DBBM组拔牙后同期植入CGF+DBBM,两组均覆盖BioGide胶原膜。术前、术后6个月分别拍摄CBCT以测量牙槽骨高度、宽度的变化,并于位点保存术后6个月种植术中钻取骨标本进行组织学观察和组织形态计量学分析。结果 影像学结果显示CGF+DBBM组和DBBM组位点保存术后6个月牙槽骨高度和宽度均发生吸收,CGF+DBBM组牙槽嵴宽度吸收少于DBBM组,且差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);组织形态计量学结果显示CGF+DBBM组和DBBM组新生骨平均面积百分比分别为(35.30±3.56)%、(26.38±5.04)%,CGF+DBBM组新生骨量优于DBBM组,且差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 CGF联合骨替代材料DBBM可以更有效地维持拔牙后牙槽骨体积、形态,其成骨效果优于DBBM单一材料的应用,可为种植修复创造有利条件。Objective To evaluate the osteogenic effect of concentrated growth factor(CGF) combined with deproteinated bovine bone mineral(DBBM) in site preservation using clinical and histomorphometric observations. Methods A total of 26 patients who needed extraction of affected teeth and received staged implantation after site preservation were selected. The patients were randomly divided into the DBBM group(Bio-Oss was implanted simultaneously after extraction) and CGF+DBBM group(CGF+Bio-Oss was implanted simultaneously after extraction), with 13 patients in each group, and both groups were covered with Bio-Gide collagen membrane. Cone beam computed tomography(CBCT)was performed preoperatively and 6 months later to measure the changes in alveolar bone height and width, and the bone specimens were drilled 6 months after site preservation during implant surgery for histological analyses. Results CBCT showed that the height and width of alveolar bone were absorbed 6 months after site preservation in the CGF+DBBM and DBBM groups, and the reduction in alveolar ridge width in the CGF+DBBM group was statistically less than the DBBM group(P < 0.05). The histomorphometry results showed that the percentage of new bone in the CGF+DBBM and DBBM groups were 35.30% ± 3.56% and 26.38% ± 5.04%, respectively, and the amount of new bone in the CGF+DBBM group was statistically higher than the DBBM group(P < 0.05). Conclusion CGF combined with DBBM is superior to DBBM in maintaining the alveolar bone volume and shape in site preservation, which creates favorable conditions for implant restoration.
关 键 词:牙种植 位点保存 骨替代材料 脱蛋白牛骨基质 BIO-OSS Bio-Gide胶原膜 引导骨再生 浓缩生长因子 新生骨 组织形态计量学
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7