搭便车行为下考虑不同回收模式的闭环供应链决策研究  

Study on Closed-loop Supply Chain Decision Considering Different Recycling Modes Under Free-rider Behavior

作　　者：曹庆奎 李颖 任向阳 李东宁 CAO Qingkui;LI Ying;REN Xiangyang;LI Dongning(School of Management Engineering and Business,Hebei University of Engineering,Handan,Hebei 056038,China;Faculty of Economics and Management,Langfang Normal University,Langfang,Hebei 065000,China)

机构地区：[1]河北工程大学管理工程与商学院,河北邯郸056038 [2]廊坊师范学院经济与管理学院,河北廊坊065000

出　　处：《河北工程大学学报（自然科学版）》2022年第1期106-112,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Engineering:Natural Science Edition

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(61375003);河北省社会科学基金资助项目(HB17GL022);河北省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(SD181012)。

摘　　要：为了研究不同回收模式对搭便车行为下的闭环供应链决策的影响,针对由制造商、零售商和消费者组成的闭环供应链系统,基于Stackelberg博弈,构建了制造商回收模型和零售商回收模型,探讨了不同回收模型对闭环供应链决策的影响。研究发现:搭便车对零售商产生消极影响,对制造商产生积极影响;回收模式的选择对产品定价和需求量没有影响,却对回收价格有影响;制造商回收模型下制造商的利润不一定比零售商回收模型下的利润高,但零售商回收模式下零售商的利润一定比制造商回收模式下的利润高。In order to study the influence of different recycling models on the closed-loop supply chain(CLSC)decision-making under free-rider behavior,aiming at the closed-loop supply chain system composed of manufacturers,retailers and consumers,based on Stackelberg game,the manufacturer recycling model and the retailer recycling model were constructed,and the influence of different recycling models on the closed-loop supply chain decision-making is discussed.The study finds that free-riding has a negative impact on retailers and a positive impact on manufacturers;the choice of recycling mode has no effect on product pricing and demand,but has effect on recycling price;the manufacturer’s profit under the manufacturer recycling model is not necessarily higher than that under the retailer recycling model,but the retailer’s profit under the retailer recycling model must be higher than that under the manufacturer recycling model.

关 键 词：回收模式 搭便车行为 闭环供应链 STACKELBERG博弈 

分 类 号：F274[经济管理—企业管理]