西方马克思主义学者叙事政治学思想述评  

A Review of Western Marxist Scholars Thoughts on Narrative Politics

作　　者：张开焱 ZHANG Kaiyan(School of Humanities and Journalism,Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College,363105,Zhangzhou,China)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学嘉庚学院人文与传播学院,漳州363105

出　　处：《北方工业大学学报》2022年第1期60-73,共14页Journal of North China University of Technology

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“叙事形式的政治潜素与意义及其生成模式研究”(10BZW004)。

摘　　要：西方马克思主义学者在叙事政治学方向上取得了显著成果。卢卡契阐释叙事形式政治性的总符码是“总体性”,可根据叙事形式的是否具有整体性判断作者世界观及政治立场。戈尔德曼的套盒式阐释模式在作品形式(话语与形象结构)隐含的世界观与社会经济结构之间建立了同源性。詹姆逊的三层次叙事阐释模式,揭示了具体文本叙事形式与社会生产方式之间有最终渊源关系,后者是投射在叙事形式中的政治无意识。本雅明、萨特等都在叙事政治学方面有某些值得注意的成果。他们的叙事政治学思想具有丰富洞见和启示,也存在需要继续探讨的问题。Western Marxist scholars have made remarkable achievements in the direction of narrative politics.Lukacs explained that the total symbol of the political nature of narrative form is“totality”,and the author s world view and political position can be judged according to whether the narrative form has integrity;Goldman s box interpretation establishes homology between the world view implied in the form of works(Discourse and image structure)and the socio-economic structure;Jameson s three-level narrative interpretation reveals that there is the ultimate origin relationship between the specific text narrative form and the mode of social production,which is the political unconsciousness projected in the narrative form;Benjamin and Sartre have some noteworthy achievements in narrative politics.Their thoughts of narrative politics have rich insights and enlightenment,and there are also problems that need to be further discussed.

关 键 词：西方马克思主义 叙事政治学 卢卡契 戈尔德曼 詹姆逊 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]