对比经结膜入路开眶术和内外联合开眶术摘除视神经内侧眼眶海绵状血管瘤的临床效果  

Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Orbitotomy for Orbital Cavernous Hemangiomas Removal Through Transconjunctival Orbitotomy and Lateral-Medial Orbitotomy

作　　者：杨亚斌 柯红琴 段聪 张利伟 YANG Yabin;KE Hongqin;DUAN Cong;ZHANG Liwei(Dept.of Ophthalmology,The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University/The 2nd People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province/Yunnan Ophthalmology Hospital/Key Laboratory of Yunnan Province for The Prevention and Treatment of Ophthalmology,Yunnan Eye Institute,Kunming Yunnan 650021,China)

机构地区：[1]云南大学附属医院/云南省第二人民医院眼科/云南省眼科医院/云南省眼部疾病临床医学研究中心,云南昆明650021

出　　处：《昆明医科大学学报》2022年第4期38-43,共6页Journal of Kunming Medical University

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(81860171);云南省卫生健康委员会医学后备人才培养计划基金资助项目(H-2018020)。

摘　　要：目的评估经结膜入路前路开眶术,内外侧联合开眶术,2种不同入路手术摘除肌锥内视神经内侧眼眶海绵状血管瘤的临床效果。方法回顾性分析云南省第二人民医院2009年09月至2019年09月收治的68例眼眶海绵状血管瘤,根据术式分为A、B 2组。A组为结膜入路前路开眶术共33例,B组为内外侧联合开眶术共35例,评估2组患者在平均住院时间、手术时间、手术操作空间、术中出血量、肿瘤完整摘、术后并发症等指标,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结果A组平均住院天数为(5.03±1.63)d,B组为(8.34±2.13)d,两者相比差异有统计学意义(t=-4.926,P=0.000)。A组平均手术时间为(55.62±5.43)min,B组为(109.21±13.72)min,两者相比差异有统计学意义(t=-16.428,P=0.000)。手术操作空间用注水法测量,用所注水的体积表示,A组平均为(5.22±0.21)mL,B组平均为(16.501±1.22)mL,两者相比差异有统计学意义(t=-48.362,P=0.000)。术中出血量:A组平均为(17.22±1.65)mL,B组平均为(59.29±6.42)mL,两者相比差异有统计学意义(t=-28.098,P=0.000)。肿瘤完整摘除率:A组为90.9%(30/33),B组为97.14%(34/35);术后视力:A组患者术后视力提高和不变者占93.9%(31/33),术后视力下降占6.06%(2/33);B组术后视力提高和不变者占85.71%(30/35),术后视力下降或丧失者占14.3%(5/35)。结论结膜入路前路开眶术和内外侧联合开眶术在神经内侧眼眶海绵状血管瘤摘除术中各有优缺点,正确选择手术方式是完整摘除眼眶海绵状血管瘤的关键,术前应根据影像学资料准确判断肿瘤位置和大小。Objectve To evaluate the clinical outcomes of orbitotomy for orbital cavernous hemangiomas through transconjunctival orbitotomy and lateral-medial orbitotomy.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 68 cases of orbital cavernous hemangioma admitted to the Second People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province from September 2009 to September 2019.All cases were divided into two groups,patients underwent transconjunctival orbitotomy were assigned in group A(33 cases)and patients underwent lateral-medial orbitotomy were assigned in group B(35 cases).Average hospital stay,operating time,operation space,bleeding volume,complete tumor removal rate,and postoperative complications were evaluated(P>0.05).Results The average hospital stay was(5.03±1.63)d in group A and(8.34±2.13)d in group B,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-4.926,P=0.000).The mean operation time was(55.62±5.43)min in group A and(109.21±13.72)min in group B,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-16.428,P=0.000).The operation space was measured by water injection method,which was expressed by the volume of water injection.The average value of group A was(5.22±0.21)mL,and that of group B was(16.501±1.22)mL,with statistical significance(t=-48.362,P=0.000).Blood loss was(17.22±1.65)m L in group A and(59.29±6.42)mL in group B,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-28.098,P=0.000).The complete tumor removal rate was 90.9%(30/33)in group A and 97.14%(34/35)in group B.Postoperative visual acuity:93.9%(31/33)of patients in group A had improved or unchanged postoperative visual acuity,and 6.06%(2/33)had decreased postoperative visual acuity.In group B,85.71%(30/35)had improved or unchanged visual acuity,and 14.3%(5/35)had decreased or lost visual acuity.Conclusion Both transconjunctival orbitotomy and lateral-medial orbitotoy have advantages and disadvantages.The key of removing orbital cavernous hemangiomas completely is to select the right operation method.Preoperative imaging data should be used to accurately d

关 键 词：眼眶海绵状血管瘤 经结膜入路前路开眶术 内外侧联合开眶术 

分 类 号：R777[医药卫生—眼科]